Scientist claim it and so do politicians: “What we need,”
they say, “is more communication.” Then, so the belief goes, people will
understand and everything will be fine.
Looking at an email from the European Commission’s DG
CONNECT newsroom, I see that the new President of the European Commission,
Jean-Claude Juncker, has made better communication with the public a priority.
We are to be helped to understand what the EU does and how it affects us.
This implies that we are suffering from a deficit and that
through communication we will be helped to realise just how wonderful the EU
is, and then all will be well.
Let me now look at the best evidence for this statement. Oh
dear! I cannot find any.
Now I turn to science. Here to we are being told that we are
suffering from a deficit and that through communication we will be helped to
realise just how wonderful Western science is, and then all will be well.
Let me now look at the best evidence for this statement. Oh
dear! I cannot find any.
Best evidence it seems is something that arises when one is
seeking to push a particular agenda, but at all other times, scientists are
just like everyone else – expressing their beliefs and opinions, which is
actually what they do when they pushing a particular agenda too, it is just
that then they hide behind a cloak of respectability and say, in effect, “trust
me I am scientist.” Not a chance.
In both cases that I mentioned above, you will note that
there are no thoughts that there may be things fundamentally wrong (in the first
case with the EU and in the second, with Western science), with the result that
we, the people, will always look upon both with distrust and scepticism.
So why is this important? In Europe
we see a rise, once more, of nationalism and the nasty things that go with it –
yet more dogma and perverse views. More extremism! And it may just be possible
that the EU is responsible for this, and by refusing to consider the notion
that there is something fundamentally wrong, the EU could be fuelling the rise
of nationalism. It is the old problem of collective denial and delusion, and an
inclination of the human mind to reduce matters to statements of simple
problems with simple solutions. The same goes for scientists as well –
simplification and reduction is what they excel at. And it is we ordinary
people who will pay the price for this – more human suffering and misery
resulting from the actions of dogmatic
people inflicting their simple solutions, their final solutions, on the rest of
humanity.
It is time to take peaceful action to stop this while we
can.
No comments:
Post a Comment