What was it the former chief scientific advisor wrote in her
article entitled, Finding an Element of Trust?: “We trust industry where it
suits us: in the toothpaste we use, the pizza we buy or the car we drive. But
people seem to have a problem in trusting industry when it comes to influencing
policy making.”
The 21st century’s ‘Great Banking Scandal’ was
back in the news once more last week. In chapter one, the banks brought the
global economy and its financial system to the brink of ruin through their
casino antics, driven by … greed. And we the public, and our children, will be
footing the bill for this for many decades to come.
In Chapter 2 of the 21st century’s ‘Great Banking Scandal’
we learned how four banks in Europe and the US, conspired, for reasons of greed
once more, to rig the world's currency market. And last week the four banks
involved reached agreement with the US Department of Justice to pay more than
$5 billion in penalties and to plead guilty to their ‘criminal wrongdoing’. Note
the words – this was a crime. They also agreed to assist with investigations
aimed at bringing criminal charges against the individuals involved.
The bad news for us is that the banks will not be paying
these fines! Oh yes they will hand over the money, but then they will pass this
‘cost’ onto us in the form of increased bank charges, so over time they will
recover the money and all will be as it was before. And once again we, the
public will end up paying a high price for the banks’ greed.
What was it the former chief scientific advisor wrote in her
article entitled, Finding an Element of Trust?: “We trust industry where it
suits us: in the toothpaste we use, the pizza we buy or the car we drive. But
people seem to have a problem in trusting industry when it comes to influencing
policy making.”
Now we know why we should not trust industry and also people
like the former chief scientific advisor. I have said before and will say it again: we now live in a time when people advise in their own interests and that
of the vested interest group they are part of. You would be very naïve if you thought
otherwise. It is all about money – I am referring to science.
The really important question is: how could someone who
wrote the nonsense that is the article Finding an Element of Trust?, who said
so many stupid things like “science must have a seat in government”, ever get
the job of chief scientific advisor to the President of the European Commission?
The evidence against such a stupid notion that scientists are in anyway suited
to having any role in government, beyond providing expert input when requested,
is now overwhelming, but those caught up in the ideology and dogma of science,
and who have convinced themselves that they have discovered the way to a better
world (as CP Snow believed) will not see it this way – people caught-up in such
thinking very rarely do, and neither do they see that the end can never justify
the means.
Is it not time for the European Parliament to undertaking an
inquiry in the whole affair of the scandal that is the story of the former
chief scientific advisor?
Scientists excel in the art of making fools of themselves in
public! And this is what the fragmented reductive mind results in. It is time
to bring science and scientists under control before their collective delusions
and pursuit of fortune and glory bring about … To be continued.
No comments:
Post a Comment