Sunday, 31 July 2016
The aftermath of the UK’s EU Referendum: exploring social media’s imaginary realities #4
Now to the matter of that campaign, in the imaginary world of Facebook, called Keep Britain in the European Union. It has only 40,000 likes! Big data is telling you something, for sure!
This campaign (is that the right word?) says that Remainers must fight on, because, the Leave campaign – not sure which particular Leave campaign they are referring to here because there were several – deliberately misled. So if, (whatever) Leave campaign they are referring to, did mislead, so is Keep
European Union. For example, they say that the referendum was advisory. It
was not advisory. They also say that only 37% of eligible voters voted for Leave, then say that 73% of younger
voters supported Remain. Misleading! Britain
Democracy works by counting the number of votes cast – the number of people who abstained is not counted. But let’s work with the opposite for a moment. In the young voter category, in the age range 18-24, only 36% bothered to vote. So 64% in this age group were not in favour of Remain. Thus, it follows that only a very small – a tiny minority in fact – of younger voters supported Remain – not 73%! Am I being misleading?
I could go on, but will restrict my observation to this question: who is deliberately being misleading, the Leave campaign (which ever one they are referring to) or Keep
in the European Union? Britain
The matter of our departure is little mentioned now in the traditional media. It seems also to be decaying in social media – half-life approximately two weeks, as with the traditional media. The Twitter/Facebook generation have found something else to chatter about and so have the press. We are leaving and that is the reality and people have already moved on.
And for the third time, the disembodied voice asked: “What are you doing Paul?”
I now know what I am doing. I have been thinking, through writing, about the nature of reality and human beings’ relation to it.
We all do it, even those who engage in the delusion that they think, that they are rational and objective, all of which flies in the face of the evidence that this is not entirely correct.
“What is it that we all do?” asks the disembodied voice.
What do you think we do?
The exact nature of what I am doing, or exploring, will be found in future writings, where ever they may appear.