In my blog last week I asked the question
whether the New Narrative for Europe
initiative did deliver a new narrative. The answer is no!
The declaration, produced by a group of
artists and intellectuals, did what most Europeans do, produce that which is
European in character, which essentially involves saying what a fine bunch of
people we are, but what a pity that a few spoil things! The few of course are
those nasty people - racists, fascists, communists and others – who did all
those bad things that we are constantly reminded about in television
documentaries and often also in films. The problem with Europeans however is
that this aspect of Europe has many dimensions
and has been with us for thousands of years. And it is still there now,
manifesting itself in new guises that we, the current generation of European,
do not recognise, but which future generations will, and for which they will also
condemn us, just as surely as we now condemn our predecessors.
I do agree with the declaration that there
is a need to respond to the populist movements founded on nationalism. This
represents a re-emergence of one of these nasty elements that will lead to
trouble in the future, but I do not agree that the answer to this is to present
the EU as the only alternative, thus doing what Europeans are good at,
either/or thinking. What I was looking for from the so called New Narrative was
an understanding that, what we call modernity, that what emerged from the
enlightenment and the scientific revolution, while increasing our material
wellbeing, has failed. With that failure also comes an understanding that the
Nation State and its institutions, as well as Supra States, namely the EU and
its institutions, are all failing, and that Nationalism and Europeanism, are
not the way forward, have nothing new to offer, and that the time has come to
be rid of both, to transition to a different and more democratic way of
organising ourselves. The future one can say lies not in a system dominated by
representational democracy, but one founded on participatory democracy, where
the power of the representational is constrained and limited by the
participatory, and both are framed within the context of that which transcends
political dogma and national interest, things which are, for example, captured
in documents such as the American Declaration of Independence, Constitutions,
Bills of Rights. “We hold these truths to be self evident …”
Thus while I agree with the call for a new
Renaissance, it needs to be one based on overturning what we have now, and
building a new type of civilisation. Artists have a major role to play here,
but not by producing what that emerged from the New Narrative initiative. This
was an opportunity to tell the politicians that their world is finished.
We need to reinvent Europe, and this starts
by acknowledging that there is something about Europeans that is not very
pleasant, and we should be aiming not just at a transformation of Europe , but of the European mindset, with all its strange
values and beliefs, some of which I mentioned in my blog last week.
I suspect that this is not going to happen
from the top down, and that existing institutions are not going to accept that
they are failing and no longer relevant. Building a new Europe, a new world,
means empowering ordinary people to peacefully build a different type of
civilisation, where those in power, no longer have the power to do the things
that brand Europe as the most destructive culture that has ever existed. And,
as I say in my book, A Tale of Two Deserts, no-one has to be hurt, no one has to die, to achieve a better
world. All people have to do is be decent, and start behaving differently,
changing their lives, their lifestyles, and turning their back on what Europe
and the Nation State currently offers, thus making, by default, a different
type of Europe. And this does mean disengaging from existing institutions,
while also at the same time remaining engaged, especially to ensure that the
more extreme aspects of European culture, those nasty people, do not fill the
vacuum that will be created by this disengagement. So a great irony is, that to
build a new Europe , we need also to keep
working in the old system, thus ensuring that we create a peaceful transition.
This latter word, transition, is an important one, and is where we should be
focussing out efforts – transitioning to a new system, the details of which we
need to begin working out as we go, which is not a very European thing to do,
to acknowledge that there is no clear truth around which we can build a better
world.
It is for the people of Europe, ordinary
citizens, to create a New Narrative for Europe, and about how to do this I will
say more in due, course, for it is bound to the idea of sustainability, and
making this concept more than just empty words, which again leads me to say
that it is all about behavioural change.
No comments:
Post a Comment